Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
The explicit exit conditions of the process include: no actionable review findings, the relevant tests run and pass, the verification report passes, the spec/code/tests remain consistent, the final diff has no unexpected changes, and there are no blockers.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAn exit code only reflects 'whether the process judged success by its own standards' and does not guarantee that the behavior is correct; for example, a syntax checking tool returning 0 only means it did not find syntax errors.75% similarUnverifiedIf there are clear acceptance criteria, it is best to also provide a verification script; if verification fails, the system continues to fix issues until the script passes; if no verification command is provided, the system defaults to treating the completion of all steps as the pass condition.75% similarUnverifiedThe evaluation gate can verify that protected files changed, that the report matches the exact diff, and that each stage has quality results and a qualifying sample size, but it cannot verify that the evaluation actually ran, that the numbers are genuine, that the thresholds are reasonable, or that the golden dataset covers genuinely important failure modes, so each report still requires human review.75% similarUnverifiedFor inference serving software, passing tests is a necessary but not sufficient condition; a patch may perform perfectly in offline testing yet expose memory leaks, batching logic errors, or performance regressions under real traffic.74% similarUnverifiedThis review by default assumes two premises: being able to read a diff and reject it, and being able to run tests on a machine you manage; if either does not hold, you should stop.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1029305API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1029305MCP
get_claim(id=1029305)