Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The main reason for the surge in time at high effort levels is not that code generation becomes slower, but that the model is allowed to repeatedly execute a generate-check-correct loop; what the effort level actually buys is the number of iterative tuning rounds rather than the sheer amount of code.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIf the true bottleneck of a project lies in stakeholder decision alignment or requirements ambiguity, increasing code generation speed will only cause the feedback-waiting bottleneck to appear earlier and more frequently.74% similarUnverifiedIn coding agents, the number of turns is often jointly determined by the complexity of the task itself, the size of the codebase, and failure retries, and directly cutting turns may shift the cost onto the success rate.74% similarUnverified过度追求速度可能牺牲代码质量、上下文理解深度或复杂任务完成度，真正挑战在于保持输出质量的前提下提升响应速度74% similarUnverifiedBenchmarks have distributional bias, as the task types, difficulty distribution, and repository scale in test sets may not represent real-world development scenarios, and Max mode boosts scores but significantly increases Token consumption.73% similarUnverified若AI只加速了编码环节，却提高了变更失败率或延长了评审与回滚时间，则部署频率和变更前置时间可能不升反降。72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1029748API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1029748MCP
get_claim(id=1029748)