Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Traditional mechanisms such as input filtering and WAFs usually only scan user input and are nearly powerless against indirect injection.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/12/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified常见WAF绕过手法包括编码变换、大小写混淆、注释符插入、分块传输及利用规则正则盲区64% similarUnverifiedFilter/detection-based defenses (such as scanning for phrases like 'ignore previous instructions') are structurally doomed to fail, because natural language has no syntax that distinguishes instructions from data.55% similarUnverifiedPrompt Caching缓存的是输入而非输出，缓存LLM的输出几乎没有意义54% similarUnverifiedmod-audit uses regex-based TypeScript scanning and maintains zero dependencies, but still requires manual review when confronted with heavily obfuscated code.53% similarUnverifiedToken control is typically implemented through system prompt injection rules, output filter regex matching, or RLHF fine-tuning.52% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1030498API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1030498MCP
get_claim(id=1030498)