Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
According to the ForgetEval research, when leading memory systems were scored on test cases written by people other than the authors themselves, internal test scores of 63%-68% plummeted to 28%-33%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/12/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA detection rate of 73.43% means that approximately one in four core errors still goes uncaught, indicating that automated review cannot yet fully replace the judgment of human experts.72% similarUnverifiedAccording to the STALE research, most dedicated memory frameworks score below 10% on the task of recognizing the failure of their own memory.72% similarUnverified11 of the 18 models correctly answered at least 96% of memory read questions, but the gap widened significantly on the memory write task (maintaining the passport).72% similarUnverifiedIn memory tests, retaining the full context allowed the model to accurately locate specific details mentioned by students 95% of the time, whereas after summary compression the accuracy dropped sharply to 32%.71% similarUnverifiedThe 44% reduction in inference tokens is a self-reported figure from the author and has not been verified by third-party reproduction; the original materials do not disclose the data construction method, training algorithm, sampling scale, or benchmark test details.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1030579API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1030579MCP
get_claim(id=1030579)