Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
Of the 56 summaries that entered second-round review, 30 still failed to meet standards, a failure rate of about 54%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/28/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedApproximately 23% of papers could not be fully reproduced as claimed, and at least 496 papers had at least one claim that was falsified or disputed.71% similarUnverifiedOf the 962 responses, 51 failed, distributed as 26 truncations, 13 boundary errors, 12 paraphrases, and 0 corrections.71% similarUnverified21.2% is a relative reduction rather than an absolute one, meaning the new version eliminates approximately one-fifth of the failures relative to the earlier version's failure rate baseline.69% similarUnverifiedOf the 186 comments that reviewers separately marked as having no clear ruling under policy, 39% fell into Jev's uncertain range (0.3-0.7), while only 14% of clear cases did.69% similarUnverifiedAmong the 35 genuine failure cases, only 3 did not involve any assertions, indicating that the vast majority of failures stem from accepting biased statements rather than from missing information.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1031012API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1031012MCP
get_claim(id=1031012)