Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
In Aplos, duplicate determination depends on batch context: if a change in supplier or reference number causes a potential duplicate with a previously reviewed document, the previous review is invalidated.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/12/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA skip request is rejected if any field is missing, if the results of two runs are consistent, or if the basis for the determination has been modified by the same patch71% similarUnverifiedNew observations should be collected for mandatory cases after every configuration change, and old passing records should not be reused.70% similarUnverifiedWhen a template change affects work in progress, the recommended workflow is: first mark the change in a change control record, then in the document module search by template version for records still using the old version, then for each in-progress record explicitly decide how to handle it, while leaving closed records untouched.68% similarUnverifiedDeliverability judgment framework: when the current version B has a core regression failure and the duplicate value has been removed, only fix the relevant functions and tests, keep the finite-number premise, return a new commit and corresponding logs, and no longer reference A's passing screenshot; a maximum of two rounds of correction, and if it remains the same or goes out of bounds, escalate to manual handling.68% similarUnverifiedBefore committing to storage, the target record, permitted change types, and current record version number should be validated; if they are inconsistent with the proposal, the current record should be retained and the conflict routed to a human for handling.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1032127API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1032127MCP
get_claim(id=1032127)