Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Article 11 of the LGPD provides that anonymized data is excluded from the scope of the LGPD as long as the anonymization process meets the 'irreversible' requirement.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedUsing only unsalted hashing (such as applying SHA-256 directly to a CPF) does not constitute sufficiently irreversible anonymization under the LGPD, and the information is still regarded as personal data.69% similarUnverifiedIf anonymization is effective and irreversible, then using anonymized medical records to train AI does not require patient consent, but processing activities prior to anonymization still require a legal basis.69% similarUnverifiedThe LGPD does not require formal certification of anonymization, but it requires objective technical evidence (including processing records, audit reports and negative re-identification tests) to demonstrate compliance to the ANPD.66% similarUnverifiedData collected by cookie-free tracking tools does not constitute personal data as defined by GDPR, and therefore can bypass mandatory consent processes in most cases.59% similarUnverifiedMulti-party voluntary commitment documents lack independent verification bodies, compliance standards are interpreted by the companies themselves, and they have no legal binding force.59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1032136API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1032136MCP
get_claim(id=1032136)