Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Modifying the tool harness only requires adjusting code or prompts without gradient updates; fine-tuning the executor requires collecting demonstration data, backpropagation and parameter updates, which is costly and may introduce catastrophic forgetting.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAutomated releases often lack detailed manually written changelogs, leaving users to understand specific changes only by comparing commits or changelogs.73% similarUnverifiedAdjusting system prompts requires no model retraining, is extremely low-cost, yet can produce effects comparable to a version update.73% similarUnverifiedFor security-sensitive paths such as credentials and permissions, upgrade risk cannot be assessed solely by version number level; the specific changes must also be manually reviewed in the changelog.72% similarUnverifiedMitigating prompt drift requires pinning the LLM version and parameters, recording the full prompt and response for every step, and running regression tests; but silent updates from model vendors and changes in tool return formats also cause drift, so prompts, model versions, parameters, and tool schemas should be versioned together as one set of immutable configuration.72% similarUnverifiedWhen a tool schema changes but the corresponding instruction descriptions in the prompt are not updated in sync, the model may generate malformed tool call requests, leading to runtime exceptions.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1032859API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1032859MCP
get_claim(id=1032859)