Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The author initially defined "done" as having published an article, and was wrong three times in four days because corrections were also counted as victories; after adding "and no one discovered an error afterward," the standard became more accurate.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe results of the paper's experiments were scored and evaluated by the original paper's authors themselves.57% similarUnverifiedThe original article stops abruptly after presenting why this is cool, without elaborating on specific execution results and data, making it more like an experimental manifesto or the opening of a series.57% similarUnverifiedPublishing hundreds of manuscripts does not mean every one is a verified mathematical breakthrough; the relevant results still require independent, rigorous review and are far from equivalent to solving complete conjectures.56% similarUnverifiedThe author lists practices that did not work for them: massive monolithic context files, feeding complete session logs to the next session, letting the agent decide task scope on its own, and trusting co-generated tests.56% similarUnverifiedAmong the 10 papers, 1 author answered all questions, but the action editor discovered a significant flaw in the paper during the interview process.55% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1033127API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1033127MCP
get_claim(id=1033127)