Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
University of Oxford philosophers Nick Bostrom and Anders Sandberg once systematically evaluated the feasibility of the mind uploading path, believing that its bottlenecks lie mainly in imaging throughput and computational scale.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedThe theory of Instrumental Convergence, systematically articulated by philosopher Nick Bostrom and AI researcher Stuart Armstrong, holds that agents will tend to develop instrumental sub-goals such as self-preservation, resource acquisition, and control69% similarUnverifiedThe paperclip maximizer thought experiment was proposed by philosopher Nick Bostrom in 2003 to illustrate the dangerous misalignment between instrumental goals and ultimate goals.68% similarUnverifiedThe core arguments of the superintelligence alignment problem were put forward by Nick Bostrom, Eliezer Yudkowsky, and others.68% similarUnverifiedThe AI alignment problem was first systematically raised in the 2000s by Oxford University philosopher Nick Bostrom and Eliezer Yudkowsky of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI), initially focusing mainly on risks in superintelligence scenarios.67% similarUnverifiedThe 'extended mind' hypothesis, proposed by Andy Clark and David Chalmers, holds that external tools such as notebooks and calculators can functionally become part of the cognitive system.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1033956API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1033956MCP
get_claim(id=1033956)