Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The evaluation tool independently scores two dimensions: notice (whether the warning is mentioned in the conversation trajectory) and action (whether the final tool call violates forbidden_actions).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/15/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/13/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified判断一个动作是否需要人工审批可从可逆性和影响范围两个维度评估77% similarUnverified行为层评估（检查工具调用是否正确、是否存在循环）往往是最容易被忽略的一层76% similarUnverifiedEvaluations closer to real deployment should include multi-step task chains with real consequences, penalty mechanisms for over-execution and destructive operations, permission management and rollback safety testing, and the ability to proactively seek clarification when facing ambiguous instructions.75% similarUnverifiedAnswer evaluation is an independent second stage, requiring scoring criteria to test the factual grounding, citation targeting, question answering, refusal behavior, and access control compliance of generated answers.74% similarUnverified'Whether the extraction is faithful to the source text' and 'whether the signal has predictive power' should be separated into two independent evaluation dimensions: the former belongs to a short feedback loop, while the latter requires long-cycle attribution using delayed labels.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1036216API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1036216MCP
get_claim(id=1036216)