Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Automatic scoring that cannot be audited invites the most dangerous kind of credulity.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA fully automated process lacks human review, which may bring the risk of unstable content quality, and creators still need to regularly check the final results generated in the spreadsheet.64% similarUnverifiedUsing a checklist can formalize high-risk items that are easily overlooked during skimming—such as cross-file renames and public interface changes—into fixed review items.63% similarUnverifiedIn secret scanning scenarios, both false positives and false negatives carry extremely high costs: false negatives may lead to data breaches, while false positives overwhelm security teams with large volumes of invalid alerts62% similarUnverifiedThe false positive rate of mature commercial vulnerability scanners often fluctuates between 30% and 70%, AI agents in complex scenarios may have an even higher misjudgment rate, and SRC platforms have penalty mechanisms for accounts that frequently submit invalid reports.62% similarUnverifiedMisjudgment of feedback signals is one of the greatest risks in negative memory systems: incorrectly labeling valid solutions as failures causes systemic losses.62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1036249API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1036249MCP
get_claim(id=1036249)