Unverified50% confidenceCautionExact time
The breaking points of expert evaluation include: experts are slow, expensive, and busy; manually writing 200 test cases is unrealistic; and re-reading all conversations every time a prompt changes is absurd.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedVague task descriptions, lack of clear acceptance criteria, undefined scope of modifications, and failure to decompose sub-steps can cause agents to fall into repeated exploratory loops.77% similarUnverifiedHigh error rates in the early stages may cause the router to prematurely abandon certain experts whose answers could have brought high value once the correction function is learned, forming a self-reinforcing negative feedback loop.72% similarUnverifiedIf the router consistently favors a small number of experts, the remaining experts will remain idle for extended periods, leading to low parameter utilization and unstable gradient updates.72% similarVerifiedAgents face the problem of error cascading: judgment errors in early steps are amplified exponentially with the number of iterations.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1036269API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1036269MCP
get_claim(id=1036269)