Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The file management Agent example in the article omits the actual execution of tool_calls and the return of results, lacking production-grade elements such as a tool call execution loop, error retries and concurrency control.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn tool calling, the model itself does not execute code but is only responsible for deciding which tool to call, while actual execution authority remains in the host program controlled by the developer.68% similarUnverifiedThe none effort parameter has been removed from the schema, and legacy system tool-calling capabilities that relied on this parameter to execute function calls at the chat completions endpoint will stop working and must be migrated to the Responses API.65% similarUnverifiedA tool is only useful when it is correctly configured and its credentials permit the operation; if the tool's credentials do not allow a certain operation, the Agent cannot authorize the use of that tool.65% similarUnverifiedThe model itself cannot directly operate the file system; all actions such as reading, writing, and listing directories must be performed through Tool Calls.64% similarUnverifiedWhen a coding agent's hook crashes, times out, or points to a nonexistent script, most tools by default choose to let it pass (fail-open).63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1036960API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1036960MCP
get_claim(id=1036960)