Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The criteria are divided into four families—foundational, premature disclosure, goal deviation, and information omission—with 19 failure modes in total, of which 18 were triggered in actual testing.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the benchmark's 60 runs, the early termination conditions were triggered 27 times, including 21 detections of lack of progress and 6 cases of model provider unavailability.78% similarUnverifiedAmong 19 studies that reported which direction the evaluator's errors lean, 12 lean toward passing work that should have failed, 3 lean in the opposite direction, and 4 are mixed.77% similarUnverifiedThe developer cautions that the sample size of 18 matchups is insufficient to rank the models reliably.76% similarUnverifiedIn few-shot scenarios (e.g., approximately 20 samples per class), multi-class subdivision should be abandoned, all defects should be collapsed into a binary classification problem (defective/non-defective), and specific classification should be left to manual post-processing.74% similarUnverifiedThis benchmark uses 10 original short documents of 200 to 250 words each, with 18 planted anomalies, 37 scoring entries in total (18 dirty and 19 clean), testing 13 models with 74 prompts per model.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1038817API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1038817MCP
get_claim(id=1038817)