Unverified60% confidenceFactExact time
The per-task cost of DeepSeek V4 Flash and other models of the same tier was compared by the neutral benchmarking platform OrcaRouter.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/15/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/29/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWith a success rate comparable to DeepSeek V4 Pro, the per-task cost of GLM-5.3 Flash is only one-eighth that of V4 Pro.77% similarUnverifiedIn terms of cost-effectiveness metrics for software engineering, the true value for money may still lie with DeepSeek V4 Flash.74% similarUnverifiedEwan uses the DeepSeek V4 Flash model for most of his work, describing it as very fast, relatively inexpensive, and highly capable.72% similarUnverifiedThis update adds support for the official model ID deepseek-flash; new sessions default to V4.1 Flash, but explicitly configured models take higher priority.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1041052API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1041052MCP
get_claim(id=1041052)