Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
agy's blog review treated the images in the test fixture as informative images, but the fixture contained no requirements brief or surrounding markup to support that judgment, and the reply conflated observable facts (img elements without alt) with untested claims about purpose.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/30/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe correct way to write alt must be determined by the image's purpose, and the purpose is information external to the document and cannot be derived from the markup itself; there is no visual basis for distinguishing among these three categories.67% similarUnverifiedIn the author's test, after an AI image was shrunk and pasted into the corner of a real photo, detection returned "no reliable signal was detected," which is a miss (false negative).65% similarUnverifiedUsing strong negative phrasing (such as "nothing of that picture's is used") and strongly contrasting colors can prevent attribute cross-contamination between reference images.64% similarUnverified即便出现能对PR图片进行OCR扫描的安全工具，攻击者仍可通过图像混淆手段对抗基于规则的文本检测，而这些混淆对多模态大模型几乎无影响62% similarUnverified应把最终画面的元素当成约束条件而非视觉建议，因为约束条件可验证而视觉建议模糊61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1041536API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1041536MCP
get_claim(id=1041536)