Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In the experiment, when Gemini 4 transferred from simulation to the real robot, it adjusted the release timing by a few centimeters until it made the hole 7 times in a row.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/30/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn the real humanoid robot, Gemini 4 adopted a progressive adjustment strategy, observing the landing point of each beanbag and adjusting the release point by a few centimeters until seven consecutive throws went into the hole.79% similarUnverifiedAfter Gemini's free quota ran out midway through development, the author consolidated all calls into one function: try Gemini first, retry once on 503/429, then fall back to Claude, and added a circuit breaker — skipping Gemini for 60 seconds after a quota error.72% similarUnverifiedAccording to a benchmark run headlessly via Antigravity on the same seven-constraint article planning task (three trials each, n=6, measured on 2026-09-27), Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking) both scored 17/17 on machine-verified constraint adherence, but the median wall-clock time was 23 seconds for Gemini versus 67 seconds for Opus.71% similarUnverifiedThere are rumors that the new Gemini 4 Pro model may support a context length of up to 2M tokens.71% similarUnverifiedIn actual testing on the POS reporting automation project, Gemini 3.1 Pro had a single-step latency of 28–45 seconds, consumed about 42% of quota, and failed after 3 refactoring iterations; Gemini 3.8 Flash High had a single-step latency of 3–6 seconds, consumed about 11% of quota, and succeeded on the first try.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1041643API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1041643MCP
get_claim(id=1041643)