Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The phrase "overturning polysemy" itself may be too absolute, and whether polysemy has been thoroughly resolved or merely mitigated under certain settings still needs further clarification.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/14/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA truly safe laziness determination requires both semantic equivalence and substitutability to hold simultaneously: not only is the content restated elsewhere, but that place where it is restated must also necessarily appear in all subsequent reachable paths.68% similarUnverifiedA formal proof guarantees that the formalized statement holds under the given axioms, but cannot automatically guarantee that the statement is exactly what the paper claims it to be; the correspondence between the two requires manual verification.68% similarUnverifiedThe author points out that Krea 2 cannot distinguish left from right, and its prompt adherence is also imperfect, requiring repeated emphasis in prompts when generating multi-directional sprites.68% similarUnverifiedConflating engineering constraints with principled constraints—whether excessively pessimistic or blindly optimistic—will lead to misjudgment.67% similarUnverifiedExplicit 'fake bad' instructions produced significantly greater distortion than mere contextual framing cues.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1042570API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1042570MCP
get_claim(id=1042570)