Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
When the contribution of fine-tuning is artificially reduced, the advantage brought by cross-prompt inference also shrinks substantially, supporting at the causal level the judgment that rare-class knowledge is still retained in the pretrained part.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified在提示中提供对比性示例（同时给出正反案例）比单独给出正面案例的引导效果更强，属于少样本学习（Few-shot Learning）79% similarUnverifiedOver-reliance on instant prompts may weaken the training effect of on-the-spot expression and knowledge internalization.79% similarUnverified增加负样本描述（When NOT to Use）能明确 Skill 的决策边界，显著减少误触发78% similarUnverifiedHuman learning of new skills relies on prior knowledge transfer, causal reasoning, and highly compressed conceptual representations, a capability referred to in cognitive science as inductive bias.77% similarUnverifiedThe pretraining corpora of the vast majority of models are closed-source, forcing membership inference research to rely on heuristic methods to construct members and non-members, which may introduce systematic bias.77% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1046226API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1046226MCP
get_claim(id=1046226)