Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In the answer extraction process, parsing the answer required by the tree nodes from the model output itself involves model-related errors, further lowering end-to-end accuracy.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe end-to-end bound decomposes the error sources into two parts: the error introduced by the particle-approximated belief and the statistical error of sparse sampling in tree search, allowing users to back out the required number of particles and sampling depth.79% similarUnverifiedUnder injection bait, weak models treat the injected incorrect numbers as their own calculation results and fabricate verification processes out of thin air, with the explanatory text appearing consistent with genuine verification, making it impossible to detect errors through auditing.74% similarUnverifiedTool-calling judge models have a systematic flaw: when no source for a value can be found in the input, the judge is more inclined to reject it even if the value is completely correct, a phenomenon named the "derivation gap".73% similarUnverifiedInference methods based on model internal features face a trade-off between false positives and false negatives73% similarUnverifiedThe model's data extraction is accurate, but the generated bounding boxes are sometimes imprecise.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1046729API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1046729MCP
get_claim(id=1046729)