Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In the controlled GPT-2 experiments, although projection updates were clearly higher in lexical hits, the strict answer score of all experimental groups remained zero.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn an editing benchmark, the same GPT model's score dropped from 99% to 70% depending on the framework used.75% similarUnverifiedIn the controlled GPT-2 experiments, the unanchored projection update group achieved a target string hit rate of 28.7% under natural language questioning, which dropped to 22.0% after adding module residual anchoring.74% similarUnverifiedgpt-oss-120b scored 0.625, lower than gpt-oss-20b's 0.720, indicating that a larger model does not necessarily mean a safer one.71% similarUnverifiedThe Spearman correlation coefficient between tool description scores and correct model selection was only 0.04, with almost no statistical association.69% similarUnverifiedGPT-4等大模型在Spider等基准测试上的零样本或少样本SQL生成准确率已超过80%68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1046874API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1046874MCP
get_claim(id=1046874)