Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The author believes that even after extensive testing, it cannot be proven that the code has no bugs, plans to continue using jpm in all of his own projects, and requires that fix PRs (including those submitted by AI) must use tests to prove what they are fixing.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe reliability of automated PR and testing steps in real-world complex projects still requires validation through actual use.68% similarUnverifiedTests cover 'whether the code runs as expected', while intent verification attempts to answer 'whether this piece of code should exist in the first place' — the two do not replace each other.67% similarUnverifiedTests generated by Codex still require manual verification, as AI may misinterpret reproduction steps or write test cases that fail to accurately hit the bug; locally verifying that the test actually fails should be treated as a mandatory step.67% similarUnverified回归测试不仅验证Bug本身是否修复，还需要测试与该Bug相关联的功能是否受到影响66% similarVerifiedMutation Testing checks whether test cases are truly effective by deliberately introducing defects into the code.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1047242API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1047242MCP
get_claim(id=1047242)