Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the bet-sizing adjustment experiment, Jev's bet-size difference against opponents who fold to large bets was −54 percentage points, Gemini's was −33 percentage points, luna's was +16 percentage points, and Haiku's was +1 percentage point.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe author uses a weighted scoring scheme: in the outcome dimension, Pass scores 1.0, Partial scores 0.5, and Fail scores 0; severity weights are 4 for Critical, 3 for High, 2 for Medium, and 1 for Low.66% similarUnverifiedExperience internalization fine-tuning improved Qwen3-8B-27B's one-shot score from 37.07 to 48.22, while reducing generated tokens from 6.41 million to 570,000 (an 11-fold reduction).66% similarUnverifiedThe records made every model more aggressive—the total weight of betting, raising and all-in rose by 7 percentage points (luna), 12 (Haiku), 16 (Gemini) and 28 (Jev) respectively.66% similarUnverifiedThe simple 3-rule baseline used for comparison achieved an accuracy of only 64.4%, with Jev leading by approximately 8 percentage points.66% similarUnverifiedOn a pure parity task, GAN8 achieved 100%, JEV MLP achieved 67%, and JEV linear achieved 33%.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1047729API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1047729MCP
get_claim(id=1047729)