Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
An agent that completed normally, returned a well-structured result, and reported that it could not access the document then still reasoned based on snippets, and downstream agents treated its output as established fact, with no alerting mechanism detecting this error.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/30/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIf the check fails to run due to a network error or missing ID, it does not count as overturned but only as unchecked; if the record exists but there is nothing to compare, it still only counts as confirmed rather than verified.73% similarUnverifiedTools like execution receipts prove the integrity of the record, not the correctness of the answer.72% similarUnverifiedSchema-only post-hoc correction can achieve a number of safe completions comparable to verifier feedback; possible reasons are that the model's raw output already contains the correct content but in a messy format, or that verifier feedback mainly imposes format constraints rather than providing new reasoning signals.72% similarUnverifiedIf the framework has already erased the signal, no downstream check can restore the original error; the run-shape assertion provides a symptom, enough to send you back to the trace to diagnose the swallowed exception.71% similarUnverifiedSending only the failed node and validation errors rather than the entire generated data stream during retries is the most straightforward subtraction optimization, provided that error information can be precisely localized.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1048497API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1048497MCP
get_claim(id=1048497)