Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL uses the OpenMDW 1.1 license, which grants unrestricted rights to dispose of the model materials, has no field-of-use clauses, and does not restrict outputs; redistribution requires retaining the notice, and you cannot sue claiming the model infringes patents or copyright.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/16/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe MIT License permits closed-source commercial use, with the only requirement being that copyright and license notices be included in all copies; unlike the GPL license, it has no copyleft effect.57% similarUnverifiedThe terms of service of some providers explicitly restrict proxy sharing and resale, and OmniRoute should not be used as a stable, unlimited free model pool.55% similarVerifiedThe Apache 2.0 license, unlike the GPL family, allows users to integrate code into closed-source commercial products and includes explicit patent grant clauses, whereas the MIT license does not include an explicit grant of patent rights.55% similarUnverifiedIf a work does not qualify for copyright protection in the first place, attaching standard open-source licenses such as MIT or GPL to it is logically contradictory, because one cannot grant rights one does not hold.54% similarVerifiedIn the absence of an explicit license, code is protected by copyright by default, and others have no right to copy, modify, or distribute it.53% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1049459API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1049459MCP
get_claim(id=1049459)