Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
After implementing a process of downloading sources first and then letting the model write, 36 of 39 research citations were verbatim correct, and 95% of quotations in thinker biographies passed source verification.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen small models are made to do verbatim quotations, only 24% to 35% of the quotations pass verification against the source text.72% similarUnverifiedA document evidence model agreed with the reference labels on 36 out of 40 observations, for an accuracy of 90%.72% similarUnverifiedThe 4 dimensions within the same document share text, format, extraction quality, and source context, and the observations are correlated, so describing these 40 observations as 40 independent cases would be misleading.70% similarUnverifiedA developer reviewed 27 prompts accumulated over one year, of which 22 failed the reproducibility test (i.e., others using the prompts could not obtain the same output as the author).69% similarUnverifiedThis benchmark uses 10 original short documents of 200 to 250 words each, with 18 planted anomalies, 37 scoring entries in total (18 dirty and 19 clean), testing 13 models with 74 prompts per model.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1049795API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1049795MCP
get_claim(id=1049795)