Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
According to Peter Eisentraut's own account, LLM-assisted review did speed up defect exposure, but the PostgreSQL 19 delay also involves the knock-on adjustments caused by feature reverts during the beta cycle.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/15/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedPostgreSQL core committer Peter Eisentraut said that LLM-assisted code review is finding defects faster than the team can fix them.76% similarUnverifiedILRM's inverse lag history computation is accelerated with causal FFT convolution, but the recurrent state update is still serial and cannot be parallelized.66% similarUnverified过度依赖顶层E2E测试会导致反馈周期极长，越底层的测试失败越早被捕获，修复成本越低65% similarUnverifiedThe refinement solution improved degradation control, but contrast still worsens over time and dissolve artifacts still appear in the background, meaning the problem has not been fully resolved.64% similarUnverifiedResearch reveals that LLMs do not reliably weight and update based on evidence reliability like an ideal Bayesian agent, but instead exhibit behavioral patterns close to distributional skew, with their influence being less correlated with the true reliability of evidence than the Bayesian framework would predict.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1051307API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1051307MCP
get_claim(id=1051307)