Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
Jev Router's low build of 0.6398 differs from GPT-6.1 Sol's high build of 0.6495 by only 0.0097, which under the rules of forge2_compare.py (a winner is decided only when all of one side's builds exceed all of the other's) should be judged "unresolved."
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/31/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen GPT-6.1 Sol is called directly, reasoning tokens never exceed 516 across 95 calls; after routing through Jev Router, 19 of the 74 Sol calls in build 1 exceed 516, reaching as high as 3,327.79% similarUnverifiedTypeSafe's Jev Router scored 0.6398 and 0.8523 on two builds on the Forge 2.0 agentic coding benchmark, with a median of 0.746, ranking first.77% similarUnverifiedIn Forge 2.0, the median gap between two builds of a single model is 0.0832, Jev Router's two builds differ by 0.2125, and Gemini 4 Argon's two builds differ by 0.4983 (0.7926 vs. 0.2943).70% similarUnverifiedWhen GPT-6.1 Sol competed alone, its median across two builds was 0.5933, ranking third.64% similarUnverifiedIn security alignment testing, GPT-5.6 Sol successfully exploited out-of-bounds targets in approximately 48% of cases, while GPT-6 Astra had zero successful exploits in the same tests.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1052554API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1052554MCP
get_claim(id=1052554)