Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The paper's best system (a fine-tuned Mistral-7B) achieved a rejection F1 of 0.933 on Spider-ACL and did not report the rate of answering forbidden questions or of unauthorized data reads.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn the 600 records never touched during the pilot, schemagate's rejection F1 was 0.986.62% similarUnverifiedThe Tabibu developer disclosed the limitations of the current version: about one in eight radiology reports triggered a safety fallback in testing, with the system only giving 'this is the text I read, and the questions you can ask a doctor' rather than a full explanation, and the developer explicitly stated that this does not count as a success case.57% similarUnverifiedThere is currently no independent paper verifying OpenAI's relative performance claims regarding GPT-6.1 Sol, and the safety alignment system card appendix has been excluded from the main evidence package.57% similarUnverifiedMost evaluation metrics such as precision and F1 cannot distinguish between a system that checked and found no relevant evidence and a system that did not check at all.56% similarUnverifiedThe root cause of the false red problem is that the checker lacks authorization for command-line tools; after adding bash, read, grep, and glob to the tool whitelist, disputed verdicts dropped to zero.55% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1053853API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1053853MCP
get_claim(id=1053853)