Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The study found that code review time surged by 49% and change requests nearly doubled.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/15/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe code review stage has not kept up with the pace of code generation at all: review time increased by 49%, the proportion of PRs requiring rework nearly doubled, and the number of comments in reviews increased by about one third.78% similarUnverifiedThe study data shows that the time spent reviewing each change increased by 49%.72% similarUnverifiedThe study abstract mentions that after the introduction of AI agents, the review time per PR rose by about 49%.62% similarUnverifiedThe Harvard study found that after agents were introduced, review wait times rose 49% and PRs requiring rework doubled; 80% of companies used AI review tools, but three-quarters of comments were still written by humans.61% similarUnverifiedWhen Claude Code freely analyzed the simulated data, it built a workflow around the difference-in-differences method and concluded that treatment led to 24% growth, more than twice the true effect of 10%.61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1054957API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1054957MCP
get_claim(id=1054957)