Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
This design separates deterministic safety constraints from probabilistic model reasoning: the model is responsible for understanding the materials, extracting features, and generating an assessment opinion, while the final veto power rests in code logic that cannot be altered by prompts.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified当编排逻辑从确定性代码转移至概率性模型推理时，插件间调用的可解释性与可审计性将成为企业级应用的工程挑战78% similarUnverifiedCarefully designed prompts and explicit rule constraints can set boundaries for the model at each decision node, reducing the risk of hallucinations.78% similarUnverifiedA runtime safety layer can intercept high-risk behaviors before model inference results are translated into actual operations.77% similarUnverifiedConditional edges elevate decision logic from the model behavior layer (Prompt) to the engineering control layer (code), making it more stable and testable/debuggable compared to writing routing logic in a Prompt.76% similarUnverifiedThe model should reason at the semantic level about when it is done, while deterministic engineering code should guarantee at the system level that the agent actually stops.76% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1055030API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1055030MCP
get_claim(id=1055030)