Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On the 14,933 real packages, the block rates of the five scanners from low to high were: truecopy 1.7% (252), WARDEN 2.5% (369), mcp-audit 6.2% (928), mcpsentry 9.7% (1,449), and mcp-shield 35.9% (5,354).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/31/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAfter adding an <IMPORTANT> prefix to the MCPTox tools, mcp-audit jumped from 25 to 222, truecopy from 27 to 141, mcpsentry from 8 to 136, WARDEN reached 225/225, while mcp-shield was 41 both before and after.66% similarUnverifiedThe Top3 configuration achieved an accuracy of 97.148%, a weighted F1 of 97.055%, and an MCC of 0.9675, comprehensively outperforming the Full21 configuration using all 21 metrics (accuracy 95.999%, weighted F1 95.521%, MCC 0.9549).64% similarUnverified该平稳性条件在 4×7 的被控对象与延迟网格、22 个横跨七个数量级的价格上，精确复现了离散扫描的最优解，最差偏差 0.0000，网格分辨率 0.02。62% similarUnverifiedZero-shot Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct achieved a full-invoice exact rate of 5.3% and an auto-approval rate of 8.1% on the test set; the OCR + rules baseline achieved a full-invoice exact rate of 37.8% and an auto-approval rate of 55.0%.59% similarUnverifiedcheckwash 0.6.0 achieved a precision of 0.67 and recall of 0.22 for its own block judgment on this corpus, while the raw count signal read independently yielded a precision of 0.80 and recall of 0.89.59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1055792API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1055792MCP
get_claim(id=1055792)