Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Decision Brain's answer verification requires that every cited [id] must have actually been returned by the tools in this round, every number must appear in the evidence of the cited item, and "I don't know" counts as a valid abstention only when the rest of the answer contains no assertions.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/17/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/15/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe verifier only answers "whether this statement is supported by real evidence," not "whether the evidence belongs to the current feature," which leads to technically correct but completely irrelevant answers.72% similarUnverifiedFor tasks like contradiction verification that require holistic judgment rather than step-by-step decomposition, a single well-crafted prompt may outperform multi-step reasoning.72% similarUnverifiedThe question asked when evaluating an agent must be the same question that needs to be answered at deployment; otherwise, benchmarks will miss the real failure modes.70% similarUnverifiedIn agent systems, erroneous intermediate reasoning results may be treated as factual basis by subsequent steps, creating error cascades.69% similarUnverifiedIf the judge systematically favors values that are "documented" and rejects correct values that "require reasoning," then correct parameters that require complex reasoning to derive may be incorrectly marked as failures in evaluation.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1056811API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1056811MCP
get_claim(id=1056811)