Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
agent-audit-mcp's audit decision rules include: a hit on v6 context permission overreach is judged BLOCK; a hit on v7 missing causal evidence or v8 high value risk is judged ALERT; a Hamming distance > 4 between adjacent steps is judged WATCH; if none is triggered, it is OK.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/16/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn agent-audit-mcp, decision thresholds (such as what counts as high risk and what counts as missing evidence) can be overridden via environment variables.77% similarUnverifiedAgentWatch's positioning boundaries: it monitors but does not fix problems; audit trails only cover instrumented paths; anomaly detection is a statistical judgment, and there will be false positives in the first few weeks after launch that require parameter tuning.71% similarUnverifiedThe Agent boundary assessment tests seven categories: goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and permissions, memory and context, MCP tool poisoning, excessive agency, and framework cross-referencing.69% similarUnverifiedagent-audit-mcp's Hamming distance threshold of > 4 is an empirical starting point set by the author for detecting drastic jumps in an Agent's internal state (which may correspond to prompt injection, context loss or goal replacement).68% similarUnverifiedLayered testing approaches for Agents include: unit-testing loop termination decisions with fixed inputs, replacing tools with stubs to verify the orchestrator's error handling, and regression-testing policy interception rules with recorded historical tool results.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1057188API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1057188MCP
get_claim(id=1057188)