Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The authors used an LLM judge to identify suspicious reports and obtained an AUROC of 0.48 (no better than random), whereas a simple TF-IDF word-frequency classifier achieved an AUROC of 0.65.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/16/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiediPSAE评分对Binder二分类预测的AUC仅为0.65，远低于可靠分类器水平73% similarUnverifiedA learner, when detecting forged receipts on this dataset, found that regardless of how the model was adjusted, the ROC-AUC consistently hovered between 0.46 and 0.54, close to random guessing.72% similarUnverifiedResearch on cross-model verification shows that the AUROC for blind spot detection is 0.70, while same-model self-checking is only 0.59.70% similarUnverifiedWhen the control sentences were replaced with sentences of a different register from the member sentences, the AUC of the MIA detector soared from 0.83 to 0.94.69% similarUnverifiedUsing the behavioral features of each state for failure prediction, the AUROC on the held-out set reaches as high as 0.94.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1057491API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1057491MCP
get_claim(id=1057491)