Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In HandbookBrain, an Answer node references via CITES edges the exact section versions it used, so that later changes can find the answers they break.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedHandbookBrain's audit compared decision-makers, locations, and quotes against meeting records, passing 21/21; compared document owners against CODEOWNERS, passing 122/122; and compared decision-to-implementation MR links against hidden tags, with 0 broken links.67% similarUnverifiedCitation decay monitoring needs to distinguish two phenomena: first, retrieval-layer loss, i.e. the page is no longer included in the retriever's candidate set; second, generation-layer replacement, i.e. the page is still retrieved, but the model chose other sources as citations when synthesizing the answer.65% similarUnverifiedAttaching results to notes, so that failed notes carry failure records and valid notes carry success records, and having the recall mechanism weigh the results to distinguish them, is the only solution that establishes a path from 'what happened' back to 'what to recall next time'.63% similarUnverifiedWhen there is still no relevant content after retries, Footnote explicitly states that the document does not cover the question and cites the closest passages, rather than making up an answer.63% similarUnverifiedRAG naturally supports citation capability, with answers pointing to source passages; fine-tuning does not have built-in citations.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1057829API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1057829MCP
get_claim(id=1057829)