Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Evaluation calls to LLMs incur additional costs, but platforms usually support sampling-rate control, so there is no need to run evaluation on 100% of traces.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified应通过重复运行计算通过率（pass rate）而非依赖单次结果来判定LLM质量73% similarUnverifiedCompared to human evaluation, LLM-as-a-judge can complete large-scale scoring in seconds, at low cost and with repeatability.70% similarUnverified将LLM通过率纳入质量门禁需要在评估覆盖度与CI执行效率之间权衡成本68% similarUnverifiedThe return on investment of optimizing the test framework may be far higher than adjusting model parameters, because it simultaneously reduces Token cost and energy consumption without affecting final product quality.64% similarUnverifiedIn-situ calibration requires additional execution overhead, and how its cost-benefit ratio varies across circuits of different scales is worth further study.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1058431API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1058431MCP
get_claim(id=1058431)