Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
The speaker suggests that when teams introduce agent engineering, they first give the agent a small task with clear boundaries, provide architecture documents, repository structure, conventions, and constraints; require a plan before execution and review the plan; define acceptance criteria; enforce verification methods; and keep human checkpoints around security-sensitive or high-impact operations.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen building domain agents, process design—who provides answers, how disagreements are adjudicated, and how knowledge is updated—takes priority over tool selection.78% similarUnverifiedSound agent design should insert approval mechanisms at critical action points, distinguishing between operations that can be executed automatically and those that must be confirmed by a human.77% similarUnverifiedAgent projects share one design habit: the agent stops before doing anything expensive; 6 products described allowlisted tools, human approval queues, or confidence thresholds to pause the workflow.77% similarUnverifiedThe principle proposed by this solution is: the agent is responsible for proposing, humans are responsible for approving, and infrastructure is responsible for executing.76% similarUnverifiedWhen planning a plan for an agent, each task should carry an execution contract, including the objective, the context to be loaded, the scope, implementation guidance, dependencies, acceptance criteria, the verification method, and the handoff deliverables.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1059420API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1059420MCP
get_claim(id=1059420)