Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The only reason the manuscript was returned was the presence of a fabricated citation.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/1/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA single unverifiable citation is enough to constitute grounds for rejection, and the journal offers no opportunity for revision and resubmission.76% similarUnverifiedThe paper proposes that a citation may actually exist yet still constitute a flawed warrant, because the jurisdiction is wrong, it is outdated, or it simply does not support the conclusion.69% similarUnverifiedA valid citation ID can only prove that the cited passage exists, not that the passage supports the claim in the answer.63% similarUnverifiedThe existence of a DOI only proves that some identifier has been registered and does not guarantee that the content it points to matches the citation's description; when verifying a citation, one must open the DOI landing page and check the title, authors, journal, volume/issue, and page numbers.63% similarUnverifiedThe author found commit messages unreliable because the commit message for deleting a module said "Refactor auth".60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1060330API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1060330MCP
get_claim(id=1060330)