Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
Developer nseney1 repeatedly verified the pain point of AI coding agents skipping rules across roughly 690 real coding sessions.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedA developer shared an experiment on Hacker News: after deleting 168,000 lines of commented-out code from a project, the AI coding assistant he relies on daily did not notice this change at all in subsequent work.74% similarUnverified文章作者认为Vibe Coding新手最常犯的错误是一开始就让AI写完整计划和代码大纲，然后直接执行71% similarUnverifiedGitHub的研究发现AI辅助编写的代码中安全缺陷引入率与手写代码相近，但因开发者对AI产出存在自动化偏见，这些缺陷更难在审查阶段被发现71% similarUnverifiedA study in March 2026 comparing tens of thousands of AI-generated and human-written code units in real codebases found that AI code triggered slightly fewer scan warnings and also contained fewer hardcoded secrets.71% similarUnverifiedAI code generation capabilities increasing tenfold while human review capabilities remain stagnant has created a supervision bottleneck, driving the emergence of tools such as BugBot and Devin Review that use AI to review AI70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1062381API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1062381MCP
get_claim(id=1062381)