Unverified50% confidenceSolutionExact time
The fine-tuning experience shows that F1 varies by 0.02-0.05 across random seeds for the same version, so the average of three seeds should be compared rather than the best seed.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedJest 30's `--randomize` shuffles tests within a file and displays the seed, and applies only to the default `jest-circus` runner; `--seed=<num>` sets the seed, whose value must be between -2147483648 and 2147483647.65% similarUnverified作者对比认为 MiniMax H3 与 Seedance 2.0 效果'大差不差'，但两者在细小文字生成上都存在 bug61% similarUnverifiedThe Macro F1 of the factor identification module is only 0.5562, significantly lower than the risk assessment and evidence tracing tasks.60% similarUnverifiedCriticGen's F1 scores on criteria-based rationales and actionable suggestions improved from 0.6369/0.5994 to 0.7554/0.7900, respectively.60% similarUnverifiedThe team's current best model achieves a macro-averaged F1 of approximately 0.73 on the comprehensive test set, slightly above the team's internal acceptance threshold of 0.7.58% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1062485API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1062485MCP
get_claim(id=1062485)