Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The experiment used DeepSeek V4.1-Flash as the execution model; the cliff effect is more pronounced with weaker models, and the same file may hurt one model without hurting another.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/16/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe UP host evaluated DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's modeling results as chaotic, with obvious discrepancies from the real model reference, making it difficult to apply to real projects.62% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek released the v4.1-Flash model, adopting an architecture described as a "novel causal Encoder–Decoder".59% similarUnverifiedThe post claims that DeepSeek v4.1 Flash outperforms other large models previously used by the team in security offensive-defensive tasks such as penetration testing and vulnerability discovery.59% similarVerifiedDeepSeek's previous R1 model described in its technical report the process of distilling from a self-developed model to smaller-parameter versions.59% similarUnverifiedIn the second iteration, DeepSeek V4.1-Flash accurately understood subjective descriptions such as "smooth" and improved the leg lines to be smoother.58% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1062650API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1062650MCP
get_claim(id=1062650)