Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
The citation verification mechanism compares the set of each evidence ID output by the model against the IDs actually returned by the tool, and if any ID is not in the returned set, the entire answer is deemed invalid.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe evaluation used only one prompt, ran each model only once, used greedy decoding, scored answers based on normalized exact match, and did not score evidence_ids.73% similarUnverifiedThe check in loop engineering should be to verify results rather than to regenerate them; having the model regenerate once more often yields only another version of the answer.70% similarUnverifiedIn contradiction verification tasks, the multi-step agentic verification approach with tool calls performed worse than a single prompt.70% similarUnverifiedREA adopts an 'evidence-first' design philosophy, in which every conclusion returned comes with specific evidence, and the agent can point to the actual code to support its analysis.70% similarUnverifiedWhen debugging a failed Agent run, you should compare the passed ID against the record required by the task, check the relationship between the error claim and the adjacent records in the payload, and then re-run with the shaped result, the same model, and the same prompt.70% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1063245API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1063245MCP
get_claim(id=1063245)