Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
Dory's score on the AA-Omniscience benchmark barely changes from 1 loop to 4 loops (10.03, 10.08, 10.03), and it trails Qwen3.5-4B on both GPQA Diamond and HLE.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/1/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedQwen3.8-27B trails Claude Opus 4.6 on Terminal Bench, GPQA Diamond, and HLE benchmarks (73 vs 78.2, 89.2 vs 91.3, and 30.8 vs 40, respectively).72% similarUnverifiedDory scores 61.8 on SWE-bench Verified (4 loops, NVIDIA's own testing), while Qwen3.5-9B scores 61.69% similarUnverifiedDory leads Qwen3.5-4B by more than 20 points on IFBench (79 vs 53.83, 4 loops).68% similarUnverifiedIn the GPQA-Diamond xhigh test, the base model Qwen3.8-27B achieves 88.4% accuracy consuming 6,642 median tokens, while Swift maintains 88.3% accuracy with tokens reduced to 2,77166% similarUnverifiedThe int4 build from Google's QAT checkpoint on Gemma 4 E2B is less than 0.5 points lower in accuracy than bf16 (0.678 vs 0.683), while the int8 build rounded directly from bf16 dropped 1.3 points.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1063740API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1063740MCP
get_claim(id=1063740)