Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
Steps that can be backed by deterministic code (such as contrast validation, format validation, numeric range checks, and sensitive-word filtering) should not be handed to probabilistic models.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedRisk approval rules should be written into code rather than prompts, because prompts drift with repeated editing while code goes through review and test coverage.75% similarUnverifiedSchema is only probabilistic guidance and provides no guarantee; server-side code validation is the deterministic line of defense, and the two cannot replace each other.75% similarUnverifiedLarge models excel at getting functionality working, but they are not good at judging whether code is secure; for example, when generating login validation they may prioritize keeping the flow smooth while ignoring details such as session expiration and the strength of Token validation.74% similarUnverifiedFor enterprise procurement, benchmark results can serve as one of the reference bases for evaluating the capabilities of different code review agents, but they cannot fully represent actual usage results.74% similarUnverifiedThe benchmark uses a deterministic checker for scoring—answers are either correct or incorrect—and does not use a large model as a judge.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1063761API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1063761MCP
get_claim(id=1063761)