Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
The key to distinguishing genuine agreement from spurious agreement is comparing the difference in agreement rates between blind and non-blind review conditions, and analyzing which scoring dimensions the disagreements concentrate in.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen evaluating fact-checking systems, evidence quality and answer correctness should be accounted for separately, as a single joint score can easily obscure the true capability boundaries.75% similarUnverifiedAgreement metrics themselves only measure whether the results are the same, and do not distinguish whether that sameness stems from a shared understanding of the criteria or from mutual influence among reviewers.74% similarUnverifiedThe Confidence Score measures how much the fact-checking result should be trusted, and decreases when supporting sources are scarce or contradict each other.73% similarUnverifiedWhen two experts give different answers to the same case, the disagreement should be treated as a signal rather than noise—the disagreement itself should be recorded and the conditions under which each judgment applies should be made explicit.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1064068API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1064068MCP
get_claim(id=1064068)