Unverified50% confidenceEventExact time
A researcher who reviews for both ICLR and AAMAS posted on Reddit, saying that the eight submissions they handled were outrageously poor in quality and advising authors not to submit if they are not ready.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/18/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/1/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAmong the 10 papers, 1 author answered all questions, but the action editor discovered a significant flaw in the paper during the interview process.66% similarUnverifiedAfter the author re-ran the review panel with the actual document content, all three agents reversed their verdict, from 'no' to 'yes'; but both briefings were written by the author himself, the first demanding hostility, and the second quoting the standard text and pointing out that the previous panel had read it wrong.66% similarUnverifiedAn ICLR reviewer posted on Reddit that they encountered a large amount of incomprehensible AI-generated text during review, which resonated widely.66% similarUnverifiedAfter NeurIPS results are released each year, many authors of rejected papers resubmit to ICLR or the next conference with an upcoming deadline.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1064548API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1064548MCP
get_claim(id=1064548)