Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The credibility of an evidence system depends not on the quantity of evidence but on its reproducibility and independence.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverifiedjev-tools cannot eliminate hallucinations, and a positive judgment does not constitute proof of correctness, because the evidence may be incomplete or the judgment itself may be wrong.72% similarUnverifiedThe design principle that evidence travels with the answer requires every output conclusion to carry traceable, verifiable support, and when the evidence is insufficient to support a conclusion, the system should explicitly refuse to output or flag the uncertainty.71% similarVerifiedFormal verification can only guarantee the internal consistency of a reasoning chain; it cannot automatically determine whether the proposition being proved is semantically fully equivalent to the original conjecture.70% similarUnverifiedThe verifier only answers "whether this statement is supported by real evidence," not "whether the evidence belongs to the current feature," which leads to technically correct but completely irrelevant answers.68% similarUnverifiedVerification must be separated from reasoning: neither an agent proposing a solution nor an agent claiming the solution works is sufficient to prove correctness—a connection to deterministic test execution is required.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1064746API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1064746MCP
get_claim(id=1064746)