Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
The original article suggests that quiz explanations should point out the relevant conditions and explain where the distractors go wrong; if the original text cannot answer a question, the generator should discard that question or mark it for review rather than supplement it from common knowledge.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/19/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified幻觉检测评审器应逐条核验回答中的具体声明，并区分“上下文未提及”（过度推断）与“上下文明确矛盾”（硬性错误）。78% similarUnverifiedThe author believes this checklist can be checked without any model involvement, and that each question corresponds to a reproducible form of incorrect invocation, so the description changes can be regression tested.77% similarUnverifiedBefore evaluation, it is essential to verify that the test framework has genuinely scored every row it claims to have evaluated; otherwise, scripts that silently swallow errors will produce a false 100% pass rate that excludes the hardest edge cases.75% similarUnverifiedThe system's prompt requires that all responses must cite sources, and that 'I don't know' must be returned when retrieved results are irrelevant; adversarial testing demonstrated good refusal capability.75% similarUnverifiedThe reasoning tier should be treated as a parameter to be tested rather than a default value; reasoning is a switch for handling difficult tasks, not a setting to be left permanently on.75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1065150API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1065150MCP
get_claim(id=1065150)